IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00576607.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The LO model and the traditional French organisational culture: a paradigmatic contradiction leading to a limited implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Belet

    (Groupe Sup de Co La Rochelle, CEREGE [Poitiers] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

Abstract

This article deals with the issue of the very weak implementation of the LO model in France, although it appears as an appealing new management paradigm that can allow companies to better face a fast changing environment. The author argues that there is a strong philosophical contradiction between this innovative management model and the still dominant hierarchical, bureaucratic, centralised French organisational culture. He emphasises three main reasons that take part in this phenomenon: the misconception of the LO concept, the role of the national management education and the traditional French elitist culture. The few and limited applications of this LO model are only middle hierarchical level management change initiatives, especially in some large companies. Today, this model still seems too 'revolutionary' and too contrary to the dominant traditional organisational French culture features. It only appears today as a limited management change technique, actually far from the implementation of new LO management paradigm. But the challenges of the present deep economic crisis might well trigger its future development.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Belet, 2010. "The LO model and the traditional French organisational culture: a paradigmatic contradiction leading to a limited implementation," Post-Print hal-00576607, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00576607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00576607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.