(ré)Interpréter les réponses aux enquêtes d'évaluation contingente : du malentendu à l'analyse du compromis
Researchers still have difficulties to interpret answers from contingent valuation surveys. The usual theoretical framework, based on utilitarianism and welfare economics, fails for instance to provide satisfactory explanations for refusal to contingent questions, which can sometimes represent half of the sample of respondents. This framework is characterized by significant internal theoretical invalidities and should therefore be abandoned. Alternative analyses based on the concept of incommensurability do not provide a more pertinent interpretation framework. They attempt to show why some people refuse to answer but they do not explain the meaning of the positive answers collected. The hypothesis developed in this article is that these two ways of explanation fail because they are both based on the idea that people answering to willingness to pay questions do substitute between money and environmental goods. The idea developed here is that there is a misunderstanding between researchers and people interviewed: the researchers are the only ones to know this interpretation of substitution, while the people interviewed are concretely facing a payment vehicle that is more a compromise than a substitution.
|Date of creation:||20 Nov 2009|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in Doctoriales GDR CNRS « Économie & sociologie », Université de Lille I, Nov 2009, Lille, France|
|Note:||View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00473616|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00473616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.