IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00470144.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are open source software user communities a source of disruptive innovations?

Author

Listed:
  • Nordine Benkeltoum

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Armand Hatchuel

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This paper opens debate around the evaluation of user-innovations. Indeed the literature has largely supported the idea that users are a considerable source of innovation. However, few empirical studies have been carried out to evaluate user-designed products. In this study we present an evaluation of user-designed products in open source. We used an Extended Web-based Delphi methodology. It is an adaptation of the Delphi Technique for Internet studies where we aggregate the evaluation of 25 pieces of open source software by 125 experts from software industry. From this first data set, we build an assessment model thanks to which we extend the evaluation procedure to 152 pieces of open source software. The findings suggest that most innovations introduced by users-developers producing open source software are technically-oriented and problem-solving driven. Users-developers seem to give a major role to interoperability issues and pay less attention to usage-oriented innovations. This result tempers the current view about open source software and user-innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nordine Benkeltoum & Armand Hatchuel, 2008. "Are open source software user communities a source of disruptive innovations?," Post-Print hal-00470144, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00470144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00470144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.