IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00279346.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bankruptcy law : justification and reform
["Ex post" vs "ex ante" : Le cas de l’économie du droit de la faillite]

Author

Listed:
  • Bertrand Chopard

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This article deals with the Law and Economics approach of bankruptcy law. The author presents this field of research in two parts. First, he studies the conditions of ex post efficiency in the sense that stakeholders select the issue which maximizes the value of the financially distressed firm. In other words, the author justifies the existence of bankruptcy rules as a way of coordinating stakeholders on the optimal issue. Second, he studies the impact of bankruptcy rules on debtors' and creditors' ex ante behaviours, that is to say before the financial distress. At this time, he considers both alternative models of bankruptcy resolution and the impact of current bankruptcy rules on stakeholders' strategies. Based on these new considerations, the author tries to explain the diversity of various national bankruptcy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertrand Chopard, 2005. "Bankruptcy law : justification and reform ["Ex post" vs "ex ante" : Le cas de l’économie du droit de la faillite]," Post-Print hal-00279346, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00279346
    DOI: 10.3406/ecofi.2005.4026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00279346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.