IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/emse-01141507.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Méthodologie qualitative et processus : deux frontières de la recherche en entrepreneuriat

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Michel Degeorge

    (EPICE-ENSMSE - Département Etudes sur la performance, l'Innovation et le Changement en Entreprise - Mines Saint-Étienne MSE - École des Mines de Saint-Étienne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - Institut Henri Fayol, COACTIS - COnception de l'ACTIon en Situation - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne, Mines Saint-Étienne MSE - École des Mines de Saint-Étienne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], FAYOL-ENSMSE - Institut Henri Fayol - Mines Saint-Étienne MSE - École des Mines de Saint-Étienne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

Abstract

Le processus peut apparaître comme l'Arlésienne de l'entrepreneuriat. Tous en parlent, mais peu l'ont vu. Pourtant, dès 1985, Gartner affirmait la nécessité de prendre en compte le processus pour conceptualiser le phénomène entrepreneurial. De même, Bygrave (1989, p. 21) affirme que « Entrepreneurship is a process of becoming rather than a state of being », tandis que plus récemment Fayolle (1984) ou Zahra (2007) confirment la nécessité d'aborder la recherche en entrepreneuriat sous l'angle d'un processus et qu'apparaissent des articles (Slotte-Kock et Coviello, 2010), voire des numéros spéciaux (Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2015 ; Journal of Business Venturing, 2015) se focalisant sur cet aspect processuel. Par-delà la multiplication des appels en faveur d'une recherche processuelle, se sont multipliées des initiatives empiriques : ainsi les programmes du Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED ; Reynolds et Curtin, 2010) ou bien celui du Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2013) ont-ils mis le processus au cœur de leurs collectes de données et/ou de leurs modèles conceptuels.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Michel Degeorge, 2015. "Méthodologie qualitative et processus : deux frontières de la recherche en entrepreneuriat," Post-Print emse-01141507, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:emse-01141507
    DOI: 10.3917/entre.141.0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:emse-01141507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.