IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/cel-01432945.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Robert E. Freeman et la théorie des parties prenantes en question

Author

Listed:
  • Yvon Pesqueux

    (LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université)

Abstract

La théorie des parties prenantes formulée par R. E. Freeman en 1984 est paradoxalement convoquée dans le champ de l'éthique des affaires et de la RSE. Elle a donnée lieu à de nombreuses discussions achevées aujourd'hui, sa convocation dans ce champ des sciences des organisations allant « de soi » bien que son champ d'application d'origine (la stratégie) soit le plus souvent oublié, malgré les démentis de son fondateur. C'est en cela que la théorie des parties prenantes peut être qualifiée d'approche interactionniste de la stratégie là où elle vaut comme théorie relationnelle dans le champ des théories des organisations. C'est aussi une des théories des organisations oubliées par les manuels du domaine.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvon Pesqueux, 2017. "Robert E. Freeman et la théorie des parties prenantes en question," Post-Print cel-01432945, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:cel-01432945
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/cel-01432945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/cel-01432945/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Géraldine Guérillot & Jean-Luc Moriceau & Pierre-Antoine Chardel & Philippe Castelnau, 2022. "Solidarité numérique et relation postcoloniale : créoliser la RSE ?," Post-Print halshs-03631407, HAL.
    2. Younes El Ansari, 2022. "Who defends our employees? Typology of worker representative’s profiles in Morocco between 2009 and 2021 [Qui défend nos salariés ? Typologie des profils des représentants des salariés au Maroc ent," Post-Print hal-03723876, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Théorie des parties prenantes;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:cel-01432945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.