IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/ipppap/halshs-02537520.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reforming the School Schedule: an Indicator of Inequality in the Labour Market?

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Duchini

    (University of Warwick [Coventry])

  • Clémentine van Effenterre

    (PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

France's 2013 reform of the school schedule, which reallocated a half day of classes to Wednesday morning for students in kindergarten and primary schools, is a small revolution in the organisation of time in the French society. This policy brief demonstrates that the school schedule not only has an impact on children's learning, but also influences women's labour supply decisions. The French setting reveals the presence of two types of inequality in the labour market: inequality between women and men, and inequality between highly educated and low-educated women. Before the 2013 reform, women whose youngest child was in primary school were twice as likely as men not to work on Wednesday, and thus to adjust their work schedule to that of their children. In addition, the decision to work on Wednesday was correlated to women's level of education, as mothers with a university degree were less likely to work on Wednesday than women without a university degree, although they worked more hours on average per week. The re-organisation of the school schedule resulting from the 2013 reform induced mothers to restructure their working schedule too: while, at least in the short term, the reform did not affect the number of hours worked per week, it enabled more women to work on Wednesday, resulting in a 15% reduction in the Wednesday gap with men in less than two years. • Children's school schedule directly influence how women organize their working schedule, which is not the case for men. • Not all women can have a flexible working schedule: prior to 2013, mothers with a university degree were more likely not to work on Wednesday than those with at most a high-school degree (45% vs. 41%), even though they worked more hours per week (36 hours vs. 33 hours). • The 2013 reform of the school schedule has given mothers an opportunity to re-allocate their working time: without increasing their number of hours worked per week, it has led to an increase in the percentage of women working on Wednesday, reducing the gap between women and men along this dimension by 15%.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Duchini & Clémentine van Effenterre, 2017. "Reforming the School Schedule: an Indicator of Inequality in the Labour Market?," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-02537520, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:ipppap:halshs-02537520
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02537520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02537520/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:ipppap:halshs-02537520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Caroline Bauer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.