Author
Listed:
- Rémi Bourguignon
(IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 - Université Gustave Eiffel)
- Arnaud Mias
(IRISSO - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Sciences Sociales - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
- Élodie Béthoux
(CMW - Centre Max Weber - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - UJM EPE - Université Jean Monnet (EPSCPE) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - Université de Lyon)
- Heather Connolly
(EESC-GEM - Grenoble Ecole de Management)
- Paul Tainturier
(IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)
Abstract
Within companies, Labour Relations Professionals (LRPs) are the primary actors responsible for implementing institutional requirements concerning social dialogue. However, academic literature has paid little attention to these actors and their agency. Drawing on embeddedness research in employment relations and brokerage research, this study conceptualises and investigates the managerial embeddedness of social dialogue. This concept refers to the normative implication of the work made by LRPs to give social dialogue a greater centrality within organisations by directly involving line and middle managers rather than maintaining it at the boundaries of the company. The empirical study focuses on the implementation of a recent reform requiring French companies to reorganise employee representation. It is based on 81 semistructured interviews conducted over a 2‐year period and the collection of documents from three large companies. The results show that, in order to involve line and middle managers in social dialogue, LRPs have redefined the norms governing the functioning of social dialogue bodies and processes. More specifically, they apply the norms of managerial rationality to these bodies and processes. Finally, this article contributes to the literature concerned with the adoption of social dialogue bodies (particularly in response to institutional requirements) by highlighting a kind of trade‐off. In the cases studied, increasing the embedding of social dialogue within the organisation leads to the adoption of the norms of managerial rationality.
Suggested Citation
Rémi Bourguignon & Arnaud Mias & Élodie Béthoux & Heather Connolly & Paul Tainturier, 2026.
"Crossing the divide: Labour relations professionals and the managerial embeddedness of social dialogue,"
Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print)
halshs-05854457, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:gemptp:halshs-05854457
DOI: 10.1111/emre.70120
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:gemptp:halshs-05854457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.