IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/cesptp/halshs-05599590.html

Does the oath enhance truth-telling in eyewitness testimony? experimental evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Jacquemet

    (PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Céline Launay

    (CLLE - Cognition, langues, langage, ergonomie - EPHE - École Pratique des Hautes Études - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UBM - Université Bordeaux Montaigne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - TMBI - Toulouse Mind & Brain Institut - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - EPE UT - Université de Toulouse - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

  • Stéphane Luchini

    (CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, AMSE - Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Danica Mijovic-Prelec

    (MIT Sloan - Sloan School of Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Drazen Prélec

    (MIT Sloan - Sloan School of Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Jacques Py

    (CLLE - Cognition, langues, langage, ergonomie - EPHE - École Pratique des Hautes Études - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UBM - Université Bordeaux Montaigne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - TMBI - Toulouse Mind & Brain Institut - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

  • Julie Rosaz

    (BSB - Burgundy School of Business (BSB) - Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de Dijon Bourgogne (ESC))

  • Jason Shogren

    (UW - University of Wyoming)

Abstract

Objective. Eyewitness testimony strongly influences conviction and sentencing; yet false testimony is a leading cause of wrongful convictions. We investigate whether the truth-telling oath — common in legal systems — reduces eyewitness deception. Hypothesis. While prior work emphasizes eyewitness reliability, little is known about whether courtroom procedures like the oath increase truthfulness. Drawing on psychological and economics literature, we hypothesize that oath-taking acts as a commitment device that reduces deception. Method. In a 22 between-subjects experiment combining legal psychology and experimental economics, participants watched a video and answered questions under varying incentive and oath conditions. Performance-based incentives conflicted with honesty, allowing us to isolate the effect of the oath. Results. The oath reduced deception by 39.2% (95% CI [20.1, 59.5]) even under incentives to lie, without impairing truth-tellers' performance. Conclusions. The courtroom oath is not merely symbolic — it plays a measurable and substantial role in enhancing the integrity of eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony is the most powerful form of evidence in a court of law. Eyewitnesses affect both the odds of conviction and the severity of sentences of the guilty. But eyewitnesses also lie, and false testimony is the primarily cause of wrongful convictions. Most of the extant literature focuses on eyewitness reliability and credibility assessment, but very little is known about the efficiency of the main mechanism used in-field to foster eyewitness honesty: a solemn truth-telling oath—the most ancient and worldwide institution used in the solemn legal ceremony underpinning criminal cases. Herein we examine how the truth-telling oath actually affects the level of eyewitness deception. Using a controlled experimental test designed to address this question, we show that an eyewitness who is exogenously incentivized to lie and takes a solemn oath is significantly less likely to use deception. In contrast with the related literature focusing on the detection of lies, we show that an oath actually works to improve truth-telling. The oath is not just ceremonial, it plays a key role in improving efficiency within the court.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Jacquemet & Céline Launay & Stéphane Luchini & Danica Mijovic-Prelec & Drazen Prélec & Jacques Py & Julie Rosaz & Jason Shogren, 2026. "Does the oath enhance truth-telling in eyewitness testimony? experimental evidence," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-05599590, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-05599590
    DOI: 10.1007/s11292-026-09732-w
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05599590v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-05599590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.