IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/cesptp/halshs-01301805.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

In Search of a European Employment Strategy: the Construction of the “Job Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Erhel

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CEE - Centre d'études de l'emploi - M.E.N.E.S.R. - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche - Ministère du Travail, de l'Emploi et de la Santé)

  • Jérôme Gautié

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Bernard Gazier

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The European Employment Strategy (EES) is a key pillar of risk management at the European level. It was first introduced to cope with the risk of unemployment, and extended later to the risk of non-employment, with an increasing focus on activation and the need for maximising the employment rate of the working age population. But since the beginning of the 1990s, the qualitative dimension of employment growth has also become a cause for concern at the European level. Getting a job of bad quality is indeed a social risk which must be taken into account. It may have consequences on a worker's income level, job satisfaction, career prospects, and affect well-being as well as physical or psychological health. The ‘job quality' agenda was first introduced in 2001 and has had fluctuating fortunes, from having a central role to official neglect. The topic is highly political as well as technical. It deals with key aspects of everybody's working lives, such as wages, working conditions, employment security, gender equality, the importance of part-time work, access to training and career progression, and so on , and it interferes with other European priorities such as ‘activation'. It also involves the choice, implementation and use of a common set of statistical indicators, and is a typical area of dialogue among experts and debate involving different stakeholders at European level: Member States and the European Commission, but also social partners. Overall, the ‘job quality' agenda is a good illustration of the construction of an important component of the EES, in terms of its conception and implementation. The purpose of this chapter is to explore the evolution of this agenda. The corresponding field of research is heterogeneous and burgeoning, and includes official reports at the EU level, as well as a related ‘grey' literature (memoranda, notes, etc.), policymakers' initiatives and debates at various levels, along with other actors' reactions (such as union leaders) and proposals. Three methodological choices have been made, in order to keep this diffuse set of information and data manageable. The first is to focus on the EU-level elaboration process, and to add some selected complementary observations made at national and/or regional levels. The second is to exploit the considerable variations which occurred during the decade 2001−2011, in order to explore the changing content and meaning of the ‘job quality' agenda. The persisting difficulties of EU construction in the 2000s, as well as the current economic crisis which exploded in 2008, may be seen as revealing processes, through which the objective has been re-examined and re-evaluated almost permanently. The third is to link official documents to the comments of concerned actors or informed observers. These views are collected either from the existing literature or by interview. The chapter is organised in three sections. Section 5.1 develops a framework to analyse the EES ‘soft' governance process under review, and to analyse the interactions between political targets and indicators that make up the political agenda. The second section focuses on the difficulty of constructing such an agenda for the ‘job quality' objective at the European level, in terms of a conceptual (or cognitive) framework, operational indicators and political priorities. Section 5.3 introduces other governance levels (Member States, regions, social partners), and briefly considers how the corresponding actors interact with the European ‘job quality' agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Erhel & Jérôme Gautié & Bernard Gazier, 2015. "In Search of a European Employment Strategy: the Construction of the “Job Quality," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01301805, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-01301805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-01301805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.