Author
Listed:
- Lily Savey
(GATE Lyon Saint-Étienne - Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon - Saint-Etienne - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - UJM EPE - Université Jean Monnet (EPSCPE) - EM - EMLyon Business School - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- André Blais
(UdeM - Université de Montréal)
- Damien Bol
(Sciences Po - Sciences Po, CEVIPOF - Centre de recherches politiques de Sciences Po (Sciences Po, CNRS) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Vincent de Gardelle
(CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
- Jean-François Laslier
(PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
Abstract
Intrinsic support for democratic principles is difficult to capture given heterogeneity in how people interpret these principles and social desirability bias in survey responses. We introduce a novel behavioral measure based on the concept of losers' consent, a core idea in democratic theory capturing citizens' acceptance of election outcomes even when they lose. We implement our approach in a large-scale online experiment with over 2,000 participants forming a representative sample of the French population, where we elicit partisan preferences using monetary donations to real parties. After voting, we reveal the winning party and give participants the opportunity to accept or contest the election outcome. Results show that a majority accepts the outcome, even among losers, and those for whom accepting is not utility-maximizing, suggesting that citizens show strong adherence to the core democratic principle of losers' consent.
Suggested Citation
Lily Savey & André Blais & Damien Bol & Vincent de Gardelle & Jean-François Laslier, 2026.
"Losers’ consent: Evidence from a large-scale online experiment,"
Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers)
hal-05781894, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-05781894
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-05781894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.