IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

"Drill, Baby, Drill!" The Correlation of "Energy Independence" Policy in the United States

Listed author(s):
  • Llewelyn Hughes


    (Institute for International Economic Policy, George Washington University)

  • Francisco Flores-Macias


    (LCM Commodities)

Registered author(s):

    In this paper we argue that support for the policy of petroleum autarky cannot be fully understood by relying on an "industry preferences" model, or on explanations rooted in electoral politics that emphasize the economic interests of constituents in oil-producing regions. While these variables likely play an important role, we sustain that the framing of oil as an issue of national security is a determining factor in shaping policy outcomes. We demonstrate the importance of the framing of oil as a strategic resource by investigating policymaking within the United States Congress. To examine what shapes the collective will of Congress towards energy autarky we conduct an econometric study of every relevant vote in the U.S. Senate related to enhancing domestic oil production between 1992 and 2007. Our analysis shows that, after controlling for relevant confounding factors, the politicians' foreign policy position is a strong and significant determinant of domestic oil policy views. In other words, support for petroleum autarky legislation is a function of legislators' beliefs regarding the reliability of the international milieu to supply a strategic resource. Thus, "hawkish" legislators, who view international relations primarily in terms of confrontation, seek to maximize independence and reduce interdependence by expanding fiscal and regulatory support for domestic oil production. This result is robust to instrumental variables and misclassification-corrected estimation.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy in its series Working Papers with number 2012-4.

    in new window

    Length: 46 pages
    Date of creation: Apr 2012
    Handle: RePEc:gwi:wpaper:2012-4
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gwi:wpaper:2012-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kyle Renner)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.