"Drill, Baby, Drill!" The Correlation of "Energy Independence" Policy in the United States
In this paper we argue that support for the policy of petroleum autarky cannot be fully understood by relying on an "industry preferences" model, or on explanations rooted in electoral politics that emphasize the economic interests of constituents in oil-producing regions. While these variables likely play an important role, we sustain that the framing of oil as an issue of national security is a determining factor in shaping policy outcomes. We demonstrate the importance of the framing of oil as a strategic resource by investigating policymaking within the United States Congress. To examine what shapes the collective will of Congress towards energy autarky we conduct an econometric study of every relevant vote in the U.S. Senate related to enhancing domestic oil production between 1992 and 2007. Our analysis shows that, after controlling for relevant confounding factors, the politicians' foreign policy position is a strong and significant determinant of domestic oil policy views. In other words, support for petroleum autarky legislation is a function of legislators' beliefs regarding the reliability of the international milieu to supply a strategic resource. Thus, "hawkish" legislators, who view international relations primarily in terms of confrontation, seek to maximize independence and reduce interdependence by expanding fiscal and regulatory support for domestic oil production. This result is robust to instrumental variables and misclassification-corrected estimation.
|Date of creation:||Apr 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.gwu.edu/~iiep/|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gwi:wpaper:2012-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kyle Renner)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.