IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gvn/eprgwp/902018.html

A Previdência Complementar é, de fato, Complementar?

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos Nihari
  • Vander Mendes Lucas

Abstract

Due to the deficit in the retirement accounts, pension reforms are discussed in many countries. However, most countries consider reforms that seek to extend working years, reduce the value of retirement or increase social security contribution rates. Just a few countries implemented a transition from the pay-as-you-go to the fully-funded system. In this sense, it is useful to analyse if the fully-funded system, which is characteristic of private pensions, is substitute or complementary to the pay-as-you-go system, which is characteristic of social security. If they are perceived as substitutes, then there is an opportunity for future pension reforms to implement a system transition. With this questioning and using Brazilian data, this work obtains strong evidence that these forms of pension are perceived as substitutes, with substitution rates varyng from 8.15% to 18.0%. For this reason, there is space for future social security reforms to propose a change in the way that pensions are financed instead of just changing the parameters of current systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos Nihari & Vander Mendes Lucas, 2018. "A Previdência Complementar é, de fato, Complementar?," Economics and Politics Working Paper Series 90/2018, Economics and Politics Research Group (EPRG), University of Brasília.
  • Handle: RePEc:gvn:eprgwp:902018
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23594768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://zenodo.org/api/records/23594768/files/eprg-wp-2018-90.pdf/content
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.23594768?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gvn:eprgwp:902018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Gersten Reiss (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econpolrg.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.