IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gvn/eprgwp/192013.html

A Simple Method of Elicitation of Preferences under Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Patrícia Langsch Tecles
  • José Guilherme de Lara Resende

Abstract

This study estimates the utility of lotteries and the degree of loss aversion of participants in an experiment, using prospect theory. For this purpose, we apply the parametric method proposed by Abdellaoui et al. (2008) to preferences observed in a computer-based experiment conducted at Universidade de Brasília. Most participants displayed risk aversion for gain prospects and risk propensity for loss prospects. Real incentives for loss prospects led to a greater concavity of the utility function than the one estimated by Abdellaoui et al. (2008). We observed reversals in behavior toward risk in the presence of a certain gain or loss in the prospect, which implies an overweight of the probability weighting function and is a new behavioral finding. Moreover, three different measures of loss aversion are discussed and, when applied to the experimental data, they were more appropriate with its theoretical definition than the most widely used measure of Tversky and Kahneman (1992).

Suggested Citation

  • Patrícia Langsch Tecles & José Guilherme de Lara Resende, 2013. "A Simple Method of Elicitation of Preferences under Risk," Economics and Politics Working Paper Series 19/2013, Economics and Politics Research Group (EPRG), University of Brasília.
  • Handle: RePEc:gvn:eprgwp:192013
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23602780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://zenodo.org/api/records/23602780/files/eprg-wp-2013-19.pdf/content
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.23602780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gvn:eprgwp:192013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Gersten Reiss (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econpolrg.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.