IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Spotting Manipulation in the Tape: The Good Igniter, the Bad Painter and the Wily Spoofer


  • Nathalie Oriol

    (Université Côte d'Azur

  • Iryna Veryzhenko

    Labex Refi)


Nowadays, market microstructure is completely automated. It allows digital financial data to be easily accessible, stored and transferable, but also manipulated. New disruptive strategies, developed by algorithmic and high frequency traders, raise the question of financial market stability, efficiency but also fairness between investors. We study, in an artificial market environment, the impact of spoofing, a widely used manipulating strategy. Our evidence should help market regulators to better understand the feedback loop created between spoofing strategies and market dynamics: on one hand, the impact of spoofer on market quality; on the other hand, the profitability of this practice under different market conditions. Our results show that the difficulty of detecting of such manipulations stems from the fleeting nature of spoofing orders and the non-significant impact on extreme price movements. Artificial market allows us to test the profitability of spoofing under different market conditions: average trading volume, volatility of fundamental value, and tick size. Our study has important implications for the regulation of HFT, as we propose recommendations to regulators in terms of market rules that have not been yet introduced. We show that the random delay of market order execution may significantly reduce the profitability of spoofing without altering market quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Oriol & Iryna Veryzhenko, 2018. "Spotting Manipulation in the Tape: The Good Igniter, the Bad Painter and the Wily Spoofer," GREDEG Working Papers 2018-32, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
  • Handle: RePEc:gre:wpaper:2018-32
    Note: To request an electronic copy of this paper, please email the author at

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gre:wpaper:2018-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Patrice Bougette). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.