IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gla/glaewp/2007_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Implementing innovation in the UK National Health Service A case study in patient compliance

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Milne
  • Stewart Cully

Abstract

Missed appointments are a common form of patient non-compliance. One reason often given is they had been forgotten. We evaluate two recent innovations to address this problem introduced at one of the Scottish health boards to increase compliance at consultant-lead outpatient clinics. Patients with long waits were more likely to miss their appointment, but not, apparently, because they were more likely to forget it. Nevertheless, both innovations made a big difference and, combined, reduced recorded non-attendance rate by 90%. The administrative innovation changed the way appointments were made. At its most basic, bookings were made no more than five to seven weeks in advance, at no additional cost. Some of these patients also had to confirm their appointment. This reduced non-attendance still further, but at a cost of at least £150 per missed appointment avoided. The technological innovation used SMS and E-mail messages to send last minute reminders. It more than halved non-attendance, but the inability to collect contact details limited it applicability, and few of the patients reached provided contact details. Some fifty to one hundred messages have had to be sent to avoid one missed appointment. However, the use of the NHS network avoided significant recurrent costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Milne & Stewart Cully, 2007. "Implementing innovation in the UK National Health Service A case study in patient compliance," Working Papers 2007_20, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
  • Handle: RePEc:gla:glaewp:2007_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_35287_en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gla:glaewp:2007_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Business School Research Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dpglauk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.