IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ftm/policy/2014-06-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mind the gap between the budget lines and the programs of the National strategy for poverty reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Blagica Petreski
  • Despina Petreska
  • Aleksandar Kostadinov

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the weak links in the processes for poverty reduction in Macedonia. We investigate the weak links between the budget lines and the poverty-reduction programs, involvement of vulnerable categories of people and researchers in the processes for poverty reduction. 27.1% of the Macedonian population lived below the poverty line in 2011. In order to reduce poverty, the National Strategy for Poverty Reduction and Social Exclusion has been introduced by the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy. The budget lines for passive measures account around 45% of the total Budget spending in contrast to active measures which took only 0.13% of all spending in 2013. We have used three different approaches: an analysis of the current strategic documents for poverty reduction, an interview with the people at social risk and a survey among the civil society and academic researchers in the country. The main result is that vulnerable categories of people face with lack of information about measures for poverty reduction, especially those with at most primary education. The citizens are not involved in the process of identifying potential problems of the vulnerable group and the process of construction measures for addressing the problems. Also, the Macedonian social system faces with absent process of monitoring of the spending of the funds and the effects of the used measure. Only 24% of the respondents were monitored regularly. At the same time, only 18% of the researchers were involved in the process of creating some strategic document for poverty reduction and only 9% made a social change or their recommendations have potential to be accepted by the policymakers and cause change.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Blagica Petreski & Despina Petreska & Aleksandar Kostadinov, 2014. "Mind the gap between the budget lines and the programs of the National strategy for poverty reduction," Finance Think Policy Studies 2014-06/1, Finance Think - Economic Research and Policy Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ftm:policy:2014-06/1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.financethink.mk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Working-paper-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vera A. Wilhelm & Philipp Krause, 2008. "Minding the Gaps : Integrating Poverty Reduction Strategies and Budgets for Domestic Accountability," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6801.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petreski, Blagica & Petreska, Despina & Kostadinov, Aleksandar, 2014. "Mind the gap between the budget lines and the programs of the National strategy for poverty reduction," MPRA Paper 57252, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Stefano Migliorisi & Clay Wescott, 2011. "A Review of World Bank Support for Accountability Institutions in the Context of Governance and Anticorruption," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 26685.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
    • P36 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Consumer Economics; Health; Education and Training; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ftm:policy:2014-06/1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marjan Petreski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/finthmk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.