Is Population Dispersion Policy Necessary?
It is common to explain the market failure in efficiently distributing the population among urban areas by externalities associated with unpriced transportation congestion and external scale economies in the supply of private and public goods. Consequently, in prescribing the appropriate corrective policy, Pigovian taxes and subsidies are considered to be the first-best while measures to directly affect the population distribution among cities are considered to be only second-best policy. This paper shows that the above diagnosis may be misleading and, consequently, the implied prescription may be either ineffective or even harmful. In such cases a population dispersion policy is necessary for achieving efficient resource allocation.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||1999|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://econ.tau.ac.il/foerder/about
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:teavfo:18-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.