Mundell-Fleming: A Criticism or the Multiplier Liveth
The irrelevance of expenditure shocks to nominal product in the Mundell-Fleming model disappears once "real balances" are taken to mean the nominal money stock deflated by the consumer price index, rather than the GDP deflator. Under this alternative definition of real balances there is a government spending multiplier, even in the presence of floating exchange rates and perfect capital mobility.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||1996|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, HOBART TASMANIA 7001 AUSTRALIA.|
Phone: +61 3 6226 7672
Fax: +61 3 6226 7587
Web page: http://www.utas.edu.au/economics-finance/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:tasman:1996-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.