IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/sotoam/01-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Self-Report Measures: An Overview of Concerns and Limitations of Questionnaire Use in Occupational Stress Research

Author

Listed:
  • Razavi, T.

Abstract

As in the case with many domains of organizational behaviuor, occupational stress research has for many years been characterised by the use of self-report methodologies, in particular the written quetionnaire, as the primary means of data collection. Reliance on self-report for the measurement of both dependent and independent variables raises concern about the validity of causal conclusions for a range of reasons, including systematic response distortions, method variance and monomethod bias, and the psychometric properties of quetionnaire scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Razavi, T., 2001. "Self-Report Measures: An Overview of Concerns and Limitations of Questionnaire Use in Occupational Stress Research," Papers 01-175, University of Southampton - Department of Accounting and Management Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:fth:sotoam:01-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zlatko Nedelko & Vojko Potocan, 2021. "Sustainability of Organizations: The Contribution of Personal Values to Democratic Leadership Behavior Focused on the Sustainability of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Ira Raveh & Sigal Morad & Miri Shacham, 2023. "Sense of Competence and Feelings of Stress of Higher Education Faculty in the Transition to Remote Teaching: What Can We Learn from COVID-19 Pandemic in the Long Run," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Daniel Francois Meyer & Elsabà Keyser, 2018. "Formulation and validation of an Enabling Developmental Environment Scale (EDES) for local economic development (LED," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 9(6), pages 57-66.
    4. Sergio A. Useche & Natura Colomer & Francisco Alonso & Luis Montoro, 2018. "Patterns on Work-Related Stress and Tobacco Consumption in City Bus Drivers," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.
    5. Nicolas Meylan & Joël Meylan & Mercedes Rodriguez & Patrick Bonvin & Eric Tardif, 2020. "What Types of Educational Practices Impact School Burnout Levels in Adolescents?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-13, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    BEHAVIOUR ; STRESS ; QUESTIONNAIRES;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C8 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs
    • C9 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:sotoam:01-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desotuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.