IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/nystfi/99-080.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Value Added from Investment Managers: an Examination of Funds of REITs

Author

Listed:
  • Jarl G. Kallberg
  • Crocker H. Liu
  • Charlese Trzcinka

Abstract

This article focuses on the specialized class of mutual funds that only invest in REITs. These funds are essentially a mutual fund of mutual funds and should only exist if fund managers have superior ability to select REITs or to time movements in the real estate market. Our empirical analysis shows that, contrary to almost all other mutual fund studies, the average and median alphas (net of expenses) are positive using the standard methodology from previous mutual fund studies. This finding is not sensitive to the type of equity return generating process assumed, but it is sensitive to the real-estate factor employed. Although we find mixed evidence that positive REIT fund alphas are persistent, we are able to offer a plausible explanation of this. Using an extension of the standard methodology to an endogenously determined time-varying regression model, we find that positive alphas are much more likely to occur when the overall market is performing poorly. This suggests that managers add more value in down markets than in up markets. Finally, we examine the cross-sectional determinants of both standard alphas and the average of time-varying alphas and find that both increase with assets and turnover. Contrary to the usual result, we find that, cross-sectionally, actively managed funds have higher alphas than passively managed funds.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarl G. Kallberg & Crocker H. Liu & Charlese Trzcinka, 1999. "The Value Added from Investment Managers: an Examination of Funds of REITs," New York University, Leonard N. Stern School Finance Department Working Paper Seires 99-080, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business-.
  • Handle: RePEc:fth:nystfi:99-080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:nystfi:99-080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdnyuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.