IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/mistet/9011.html

Privatization in Transition Economies: Case Study of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Rapacki, R.
  • Linz, S.J.

Abstract

Contrary to expectations and announcements of policy makers in transition economies, privatization has taken longer than originally planned. This paper analyzes the institutional and behavioral factors that compound systemic barriers to privatization and thus transition from a centrally planned to a market economy. Part I describes the command economy legacy transition economies must overcome while initiating the structural transformation required to introduce a market economy. Part II presents preliminary results from Poland's privatization experience. Part III identifies the anticipated and unanticipated institutional and behavioral barriers to privatization in Poland. Part IV offers several lessons for other transition economies regarding the process and pace of privatization.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Rapacki, R. & Linz, S.J., 1992. "Privatization in Transition Economies: Case Study of Poland," Papers 9011, Michigan State - Econometrics and Economic Theory.
  • Handle: RePEc:fth:mistet:9011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kolodko, Grzegorz W. & Nuti, D. Mario, "undated". "The Polish Alternative Old Myths, Hard Facts and New Strategies in the Successful Transformation of the Polish Economy," WIDER Working Papers 295327, United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Rapacki, Ryszard, 1999. "Polish Mass Privatisation Programme: The Employee Perceptions," EconStor Conference Papers 130543, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • P2 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies
    • P3 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:mistet:9011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edmsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.