IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/lavape/9204.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Reverse Regression Problem: Statistical Paradox or Artifact of Misspecification

Author

Listed:
  • Racine, J.
  • Rilstone, P.

Abstract

The usual approach to wage discrimination asks whether certain individuals receive lower wages for the same level of productivity characteristics. The reverse approach asks whether these individuals are more productive given the same wages. When these hypotheses are tested, incompatible conclusions seem to result. To circumvent specification problems, nonparametric techniques were used to estimate Canadian male-female wage/experience profiles. The findings indicate that, when the correct functional form is specified and the effects of childrearing activities are controlled for, there exists a wage/experience gap favoring men regardless of the approach, suggesting that the paradox may be simply an artifact of misspecification.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Racine, J. & Rilstone, P., 1992. "The Reverse Regression Problem: Statistical Paradox or Artifact of Misspecification," Papers 9204, Laval - Recherche en Politique Economique.
    • Handle: RePEc:fth:lavape:9204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen L. Ross, 2003. "What Is Known about Testing for Discrimination: Lessons Learned by Comparing across Different Markets," Working papers 2003-21, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2003.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:lavape:9204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/delvlca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.