IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/harver/1860.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Profitability vs. Ecological Entropy

Author

Listed:
  • Martin L. Weitzman

Abstract

Privately, the most profitable human use of biomass is widespread monoculture, which creates large target hosts that invite potentially lethal pathogens. In analyzing the tradeoffs, I explain how the famous formula for ecological entropy, H'= -E qj log qj, can be given a mathematically rigorous interpretation as measuring the "generalized resistance" of an ecosystem to extinction failure. Using this measure, a relationship is derived between standard economic welfare produced by a specialized biomass regime and the social-texternality risk of its ecosystem failing. The paper shows that efficient combinations may be conceptualized as if there is some overall balance between economic profitability and ecological entropy.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin L. Weitzman, 1999. "Economic Profitability vs. Ecological Entropy," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 1860, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:fth:harver:1860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:harver:1860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieharus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.