IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/harver/1831.html

Rethinking Inequality Decomposition, with Evidence from Rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Morduch
  • Terry Sicular

Abstract

We introduce a new, integrated regression-based approach for decomposing inequality indices with household-level data, and we examine the strengths and weaknesses of inequality decompositions by income source in light of the way that they are commonly interpreted. The approach uses estimated income flows from variables in linear income equations to decompose aggregate inequality indices. The integrated approach provides an efficient and flexible way to quantify the roles of variables like education, age, infrastructure, and social status in a multivariate context. These tools are applied to a new data set with rich information on incomes in Zouping County in Shandong Province, China. The evidence from China illustrates the sharp differences that can result when using decomposition methods with varying properties, and it demonstrates advantages of the proposed, integrated method. We trace the differences to how the decomposition methodologies treat equally-distributed sources of income. The empirical results show the importance that spatial segmentations play in increasing inequality: village of residence strongly drives inequality in the sample. This force is counter-balanced in part by the relatively equitable distribution of human capital, especially demographic variables. Contrary to other recent findings, affiliation with the Communist Party and measures of social status have a very limited role in explaining inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Morduch & Terry Sicular, 1998. "Rethinking Inequality Decomposition, with Evidence from Rural China," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 1831, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:fth:harver:1831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:harver:1831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieharus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.