Measuring and Decomposing Productivity Change: Stochastic Distance Function Estimation VS. DEA
Linear programming techniques have been widely used to compute Malmquist indices of productivity change as ratios of fitted distances from a convex hull frontier. These indices are then decomposed into technical and efficiency change. However, since this approach is non-stochastic, inference is problematic. Further, although the Malmquist index is valid for any degree of returns to scale, productivity change is measured relative to a constant returns to scale frontier. As an alternative, we propose a exible, stochastic input distance frontier which allows for statistical inference and imposes no restrictions on returns to scale. Using this distance frontier, we decompose productivity change into technical and efficiency change. Comparisons are drawn between the stochastic and non-stochastic methods based on a panel of electric utilities. We estimate our model by the generalized method of moments with a variety of instrument sets to gauge the sensitivity of productivity change calculations to changes in the underlying moment conditions.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||2000|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: U.S.A.; The University of Georgia, College of Business Administration, Department of Economics, Athens, GA 30602|
Web page: http://www.terry.uga.edu/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:georec:99-478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.