IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

"When Barriers to Markets Fall: Pipeline Deregulation, Spot Markets, and the Topology of the Natural Gas Market"

Listed author(s):
  • De vany, A.
  • Walls, W.D.

Until 184, Federal regulation sanctioned monopoly as the primary mechanism for distributing natural gas. Pipelines were granted protected markets and permitted to acquire and distribute gas only through long-term contracts. To buy or sell gas, users and producers had to deal with the pipeline, they could not deal directly. Gas markets failed to exit. In 1985, pipelines were given the option to become "open access" pipelines who transported gas. This change dissolved the barriers to markets and, for the first time in more than fifty years, authorized competition. In this paper, we observe and evaluate the emergence, evolution and performance of natural gas spot markets in this new environment. We discover that spot markets flourished in the absence of regulatory barriers to their existence; more than fifty spot markets came into existence and quickly replaced long-term contracts and pipelines as sources gas. The spot price evidence reveals that open access changed the topology of the pipeline network: the balkanized and disconnected network of gas markets created by regulation became more strongly connected and spot prices converged and became more correlated throughout the network. By the end of our sample period, gas markets had become liquid and informationally efficient -- demand or supply shocks are strongly damped across the network, and the price at any point contains all the information in the network. The spatially separated spot markets are now so strongly connected that they form a single national market for natural gas.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by California Irvine - School of Social Sciences in its series Papers with number 90-92-28.

in new window

Length: 35 pages
Date of creation: 1992
Handle: RePEc:fth:calirv:90-92-28
Contact details of provider: Postal:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:calirv:90-92-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.