IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Economic Strategies for Banishing Child-Labour: Compulsory Primary Education, Specific vs. General Egalitarianism, and Innovation in Financial Instruments for Mobilization of Participation

Listed author(s):
  • Binod Khadria
Registered author(s):

    Compulsory schooling of children is used as an instrument for eliminating the incidence of child-labour in most countries. Given this context, the importance of parental domain as a separate entity in decision-making for primary schooling of children in India is highlighted. Since many children work and earn for their parents in poorer societies, and parents are often liquidity-constrained, the opportunity cost of children's education is a crucial determinant for the parental decision-making. Governmental intervention for universalization of primary education therefore must lead to both 'specific' and 'general' egalitarianism, it has been argued. Innovation of a unique but simple financial instrument described as "FENCE" along with compulsory attendance laws is suggested to derive full benefits of governmental intervention in India. A prototype along with broad and rough estimates of the financial claim on the GNP is also provided.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Boston University, Institute for Economic Development in its series Boston University - Institute for Economic Development with number 68.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Dec 1995
    Handle: RePEc:fth:bosecd:68
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    264 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215

    Phone: 617-353-4030
    Fax: 617-353-4143
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:bosecd:68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.