IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ussppn/21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating the shifting priorities of Uganda’s agricultural extension services: A micro perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Van Campenhout, Bjorn
  • Nattembo, Fiona
  • Pauw, Karl

Abstract

The Ugandan government is increasingly emphasizing input distribution over extension advisory services in its agricultural budget allocations, broadly defined. Both expenditure items are arguably important; hence, this note makes an empirical case for a more balanced approach to allocating public resources within the agricultural sector. Econometric results from official household-level survey data suggest that combining inputs and extension services is associated with higher yields. For maize and groundnut, in particular, the benefits of offering modern inputs and extension together exceed those of providing either exclusively. We conclude that the government’s current approach, which focuses mainly on the logistics of input distribution, may be misguided.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Campenhout, Bjorn & Nattembo, Fiona & Pauw, Karl, 2018. "Evaluating the shifting priorities of Uganda’s agricultural extension services: A micro perspective," USSP working papers 21, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ussppn:21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifpri.org/cdmref/p15738coll2/id/132887/filename/133100.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ussppn:21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.