IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/resbrf/16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

WTO disciplines on agricultural support: Experience to date and assessment of Doha proposals

Author

Listed:
  • Orden, David
  • Blandford, David
  • Josling, Timothy Edward
  • Brink, Lars

Abstract

When the World Trade Organization (WTO) was created in 1995, its members committed themselves to a set of disciplines for domestic support, market access, and export competition for agriculture. The Agreement on Agriculture laid the way for the pursuit of progressive reductions in world agricultural market distortions. Its supporters hoped the new rules and commitments would encourage countries to move domestic farm policies in a less trade-distorting direction. This research brief examines the Agreement’s domestic support disciplines and their potential strengthening under the as-yet unfinished Doha Round negotiations. The brief provides a summary of the main conclusions from the March 2011 book WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support: Seeking a Fair Basis for Trade. The analysis focuses on four developed countries (the United States, the European Union [as a single “country†], Japan, and Norway) and four developing countries (Brazil, China, India, and the Philippines). We highlight the substantial differences among these countries in their notifications of policy measures and the support they provide. Where a complete set of notifications is not available for 1995–2008, estimates (“shadow†notifications) are constructed. Domestic support is also projected through the mid-2010s and compared to existing and potential WTO commitments.

Suggested Citation

  • Orden, David & Blandford, David & Josling, Timothy Edward & Brink, Lars, 2011. "WTO disciplines on agricultural support: Experience to date and assessment of Doha proposals," Research briefs 16, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:resbrf:16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://server15738.contentdm.oclc.org/u?/p15738coll2,124972
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Orden, David, 2013. "The Changing Structure of Domestic Support and Its Implications for Trade," Commissioned Papers 146657, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    2. Irene Musselli, 2016. "Farm Support And Trade Rules:Towards A New Paradigm Under The 2030 Agenda," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 74, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    3. Zulauf, Carl & Orden, David, 2012. "US Farm Policy and Risk Assistance: The Competing Senate and House Agriculture Committee Bills of July 2012," National Policies, Trade and Sustainable Development 320174, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
    4. Britz, Wolfgang & Pérez-Dominguez, Ignacio & Narayanan, Gopalakrishnan Badri, 2015. "Analyzing Results from Agricultural Large-scale Economic Simulation Models: Recent Progress and the Way Ahead," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(02), June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    WTO; trade; Farm management; Doha agreement; World Trade Organization Developing countries; WTO Doha round;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:resbrf:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.