IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/prnote/135003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Synopsis: Improving agricultural productivity in Papua New Guinea: Strategic and policy considerations

Author

Listed:
  • Benny, Dickson
  • Benson, Todd
  • Ivekolia, Mark
  • Kedir Jemal, Mekamu
  • Ovah, Raywin

Abstract

In a recent working paper, we examine staple and cash crop production yields in Papua New Guinea (PNG). In doing so, we assess the yield gap (difference between the crop yields farmers commonly obtain and what they might realize with optimal inputs and crop management) for the main staple food crops in PNG. The yield gap for sweet potato is the smallest (1/4 - 1/3 less than attainable yields), while banana shows the largest yield gap at about ¾ less than what might be achieved under intensive cultivation. In addition, we compare PNG agricultural output with areas of similar growing conditions in Indonesia to provide insight into potential investments to further spur agricultural productivity in PNG. Finally, we assess current sector policies in PNG that aim to support agricultural development as an engine for economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Benny, Dickson & Benson, Todd & Ivekolia, Mark & Kedir Jemal, Mekamu & Ovah, Raywin, 2022. "Synopsis: Improving agricultural productivity in Papua New Guinea: Strategic and policy considerations," Project notes February 2022, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:prnote:135003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifpri.org/cdmref/p15738coll2/id/135003/filename/135216.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    PAPUA NEW GUINEA; OCEANIA; agricultural productivity; policies; crop yield; cash crops; smallholders; agriculture; food security; poverty reduction;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:prnote:135003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.