IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/polbrf/174709.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Synopsis: Cost effective options for inclusive and sustainable development in Rwanda

Author

Listed:
  • Aragie, Emerta A.
  • Niyonsingiza, Josue
  • Thurlow, James
  • Warner, James
  • Xu, Valencia Wenqian

Abstract

The study systematically ranks investment options in the agrifood system based on their cost-effectiveness across multiple development outcomes. Investments in SME processors and traders and livestock extension are the most cost-effective for promoting agrifood GDP growth and employment. SMEs and livestock services together with seed systems and credit access contribute positively to social outcomes (poverty, undernourishment, and diet). The analysis finds a trade-off between economic gains and environmental outcomes— higher GDP effects often come with greater environmental costs. The Rwandan case demonstrates a slight shift in the relative cost-effectiveness of investments when accounting for historical climatic risks. The study emphasizes the need for data-driven investment planning, climate-aware policies, and balancing short-term gains with long-term sustainability objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Aragie, Emerta A. & Niyonsingiza, Josue & Thurlow, James & Warner, James & Xu, Valencia Wenqian, 2025. "Synopsis: Cost effective options for inclusive and sustainable development in Rwanda," Policy briefs 25, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:fpr:polbrf:174709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/174709
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:polbrf:174709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.