IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/othbrf/178035.html

Multistakeholder platforms in transboundary waters: What do we know, and where should we go?

Author

Listed:
  • Lautze, Jonathan
  • Nehring, Ryan

Abstract

This policy brief synthesizes recent evidence on multistakeholder platforms (MSPs) in shared river basins and presents practical guidance for river basin organizations, development partners, and policymakers. It compares established basin-level MSP approaches across three basins (Nile, Zambezi, and Mekong) and describes how stakeholders in the Incomati and Maputo River Basins—shared across the Republic of South Africa, Eswatini, and Mozambique—built on these approaches to design their own MSP. This brief translates comparative evidence and field experience into a practical toolkit for advancing MSPs in shared basins.

Suggested Citation

  • Lautze, Jonathan & Nehring, Ryan, 2025. "Multistakeholder platforms in transboundary waters: What do we know, and where should we go?," Other briefs 178035, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:fpr:othbrf:178035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/178035
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan Nehring & Jonathan Lautze & Maliviwe Mgudlwa, 2025. "What is the role for multistakeholder platforms in transboundary basin governance? Distilling lessons from three cases and applying them in the Incomati Basin," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(7), pages 746-770, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:othbrf:178035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.