IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/othbrf/1293757325.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring gender, tenure security, and landscape governance approaches and findings: Lessons from eight years of research

Author

Listed:
  • Kristjanson, Patricia
  • Larson, Anne
  • Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela

Abstract

This brief synthesizes approaches and findings from gender research conducted by the CGIAR Program on Policy, Institutions, and Markets (PIM). The focus of this work is the governance of natural resources and policy and institutions for improved natural resources management. This body of research analyzes how tenure security affects sustainable management and how individuals, groups, and communities govern land, water, fish stocks, and forests. An important focus of this work involves the following questions: (1) who has what rights with respect to these resources (particularly for women and members of marginalized groups), (2) what are their roles in managing natural resources, and (3) what livelihood benefits do they receive? Without a contextualized understanding of these questions, policies and practices can inadvertently exclude women, reinforce historical practices of gender injustice, or introduce new inequalities that worsen natural resource management and poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristjanson, Patricia & Larson, Anne & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela, 2021. "Exploring gender, tenure security, and landscape governance approaches and findings: Lessons from eight years of research," Other briefs December 2021, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:othbrf:1293757325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifpri.org/cdmref/p15738coll2/id/134953/filename/135159.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    WORLD; gender; tenure; tenure security; landscape conservation; landscape; governance; research; women; role of women; natural resources management; livelihoods; policies; poverty; landscape governance;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:othbrf:1293757325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.