IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/2184.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Short-term and long-term effects of cash for work: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Leight, Jessica
  • Mvukiyehe, Eric

Abstract

While a growing literature analyzes the economic effects of cash for work programs in developing countries, there remains little evidence about the longer-term effects of these interventions. This paper presents findings from a randomized controlled trial evaluating a three month intervention providing public works em ployment in rural Tunisia. The evaluation design incorporates two dimensions of randomization — community-level randomization to treatment and control, and individual-level randomization among eligible individuals — and a sample of 2,718 individuals was tracked over five years. The findings suggest that cash for work leads to significant increases in labor market engagement, assets, consumption, financial inclusion, civic engagement, psychological well being, and women’s em powerment one-year post-treatment; however, these effects have largely attenuated to zero five years post-treatment, with the exception of a positive effect on assets. There is also evidence of positive spillover effects within treatment communities, but these effects similarly attenuate over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Leight, Jessica & Mvukiyehe, Eric, 2023. "Short-term and long-term effects of cash for work: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in Tunisia," IFPRI discussion papers 2184, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:2184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifpri.org/cdmref/p15738coll2/id/136708/filename/136919.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    TUNISIA; NORTH AFRICA; AFRICA; economics; public works; employment; rural areas; cash flow; cash transfers; labour market; public participation; assets; developing countries; finance; gender equity; women; randomized controlled trial;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:2184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.