IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/gsspwp/179188.html

Closing the regulatory gap: Experimental evidence on oversight and worker incentives

Author

Listed:
  • Cook, Elizabeth A.J.
  • Ambler, Kate
  • Hoffmann, Vivian
  • Otoigo, Lilian Kwamboka
  • Kiarie, Alice Njoki
  • Wagner, Julia

Abstract

Weak enforcement of regulatory standards is widespread in low- and middle-income countries. Low firm capacity and standards inappropriate to local contexts imply that traditional punitive enforcement approaches may be counterproductive. We test the impact of a regulatory oversight intervention leveraging the soft power of meat inspectors in the context of 140 rural slaughterhouses in western Kenya. The intervention focused meat inspector attention on hygiene practices and was combined with training of workers and provision of basic equipment and supplies. Practices improved significantly relative to control facilities, but microbial contamination of meat did not. Outcomes were similar in a subset of treatment facilities where workers were additionally given a hygiene performance incentive. Higher volume of business in treatment facilities, which customers perceived as cleaner, suggests that retailers value less contaminated meat, but may counteract the effects of improved practices through cross-contamination and crowding.

Suggested Citation

  • Cook, Elizabeth A.J. & Ambler, Kate & Hoffmann, Vivian & Otoigo, Lilian Kwamboka & Kiarie, Alice Njoki & Wagner, Julia, 2025. "Closing the regulatory gap: Experimental evidence on oversight and worker incentives," GSSP working papers 2390, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:gsspwp:179188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/179188
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:gsspwp:179188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.