IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fmg/fmgdps/dp281.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Locally Minimizing the Credit Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Lotz

Abstract

The aim of this paper is the valuation and hedging of defaultable bonds and options on defaultable bonds. The heath/Jarrow/Morton-framework is used to model the interest rate risks, and the time of default is determined by the first jump time of a point process. In the first part, we consider valuation and hedging of a defaultable bond. The firm value process is modelled explicitly, and is used to determine the default intensity of the payout ratio after default. This means that default intensity or payout ratio are not exogenously given, but determined implicitly by the specification of the firm value process. Incompleteness of markets arises naturally, and therefore we apply the local risk-minimizing methodology introduced by Föllmer, Schweizer and Sondermann to determine a martingale measure and to calculate hedging strategies. In incomplete markets, the total risk of a contingent claim can be divided into traded risk and totally non-tradeable (intrinsic) risk. Therefore, a contingent claim cannot be hedged perfectly. We can only reduce the risk to the intrinsic component. In our model, we can hedge partly against the risk of default because we assume that the firm value is traded asset. In the second part, we consider the valuation and hedging of options on defaultable bonds. Again, we are in an incomplete market. In addition to the traded assets, we introduce a virtual asset to the market which represents non-hedgeable risk. We derive the partial differential equation which is satisfied by the value process of the option and show how the risk-minimizing strategy can be computed.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Lotz, 1998. "Locally Minimizing the Credit Risk," FMG Discussion Papers dp281, Financial Markets Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:fmg:fmgdps:dp281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/fmg/workingPapers/discussionPapers/fmg_pdfs/dp281.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fmg:fmgdps:dp281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The FMG Administration (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lse.ac.uk/fmg/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.