IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

A quality and risk-adjusted cost function for banks: evidence on the " too-big-to-fail" doctrine

Listed author(s):
  • Joseph P. Hughes
  • Loretta J. Mester

We estimate a multiproduct cost function model that incorporates measures for the quality of bank output and the probability of failure, which can influence a bank’s costs in a variety of ways. We model a bank’s price of uninsured deposits as an endogenous variable depending on the bank’s output level, output quality, financial capital level, and risk measures. Incorporating these aspects into the cost function has a significant effect on measures scale and scope economies when compared with results of previous studies that did not take quality and risk into account. We find constant returns to scale at the mean-sized bank and at banks in four different size categories. We also find evidence of diseconomies of scope at the larger banks. Finally, there is evidence that the "too-big-to fail" doctrine has a significant impact on the price a bank pays for its uninsured deposits. For banks in the largest size category, an increase in size, holding default risk and asset quality constant, significantly lowers the uninsured deposit price.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia in its series Working Papers with number 91-21.

in new window

Date of creation: 1991
Handle: RePEc:fip:fedpwp:91-21
Contact details of provider: Postal:
10 Independence Mall, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1574

Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web: Email:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedpwp:91-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Beth Paul)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.