IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedpwp/103156.html

Flight to Safety: Evaluating Stablecoin’s Role as a Safe-Haven Asset in DeFi Markets

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the stablecoin Tether (USDT) on systemic liquidity across the Ethereum and Bitcoin markets, utilizing an event study approach that integrates on-chain wallet data, pricing, and financial metrics. By analyzing cryptocurrency market responses to key protocol and market-moving events, augmented by nonlinear volatility models, we identify distinct, chain-specific flight-to-safety behaviors. Our results show that USDT acts as a primary liquidity lifeline for Ethereum holders during stress, particularly among retail investors, whereas its role for Bitcoin holders is more muted and stabilizing. Notably, we find stronger flight-to-safety evidence in Wrapped Bitcoin (Ethereum-based) than in native Bitcoin, highlighting that USDT’s function is network dependent. These findings imply that effective regulatory frameworks must be differentiated, accounting for chain-specific liquidity, investor composition, and risk dynamics, as a uniform approach would likely be systematically miscalibrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Chernoff & Julapa Jagtiani & Nathaniel Yoshida, 2026. "Flight to Safety: Evaluating Stablecoin’s Role as a Safe-Haven Asset in DeFi Markets," Working Papers 26-24, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedpwp:103156
    DOI: 10.21799/frbp.wp.2026.24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/FRBP/Assets/working-papers/2026/wp26-24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21799/frbp.wp.2026.24?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedpwp:103156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Beth Paul (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbphus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.