IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fednls/86958.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Becoming More Alike? Comparing Bank and Federal Reserve Stress Test Results

Author

Listed:
  • Beverly Hirtle
  • Anna Kovner
  • Eric McKay

Abstract

Stress tests have become an important method of assessing whether financial institutions have enough capital to operate in bad economic conditions. Under the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, both the Federal Reserve and large U.S. bank holding companies (BHCs) are required to do annual stress tests and to disclose these results to the public. While the BHCs? and the Federal Reserve?s projections are made under the same macroeconomic scenario, the results differ, primarily because of differences in the models used to make the projections. In this post, we look at the 2014 stress test projections made by the eighteen largest U.S. BHCs and by the Federal Reserve and compare them to similar numbers from 2013. We are particularly interested in the question of whether the BHCs? and the Federal Reserve?s results are converging over time, since such convergence could indicate decreased diversity of stress testing approaches in the banking industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Beverly Hirtle & Anna Kovner & Eric McKay, 2014. "Becoming More Alike? Comparing Bank and Federal Reserve Stress Test Results," Liberty Street Economics 20140721, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:86958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2014/07/becoming-more-alike-comparing-bank-and-federal-reserve-stress-test-results.html
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Stress Tests; Dodd-Frank Act;

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:86958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/frbnyus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.