IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fednls/86954.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Capitol Since the Nineteenth Century: Political Polarization and Income Inequality in the United States

Author

Abstract

Even the most casual observer of American politics knows that today?s Republican and Democratic parties seem to disagree with one another on just about every issue under the sun. Some assume that this divide is merely an inevitable feature of a two-party system, while others reminisce about a golden era of bipartisan cooperation and hold out hope that a spirit of compromise might one day return to Washington. In this post, we present evidence that political polarization?or the trend toward more ideologically distinct and internally homogeneous parties?is not a recent development in the United States, although it has reached unprecedented levels in the last several years. We also show that polarization is strongly correlated with the extent of income inequality, but only weakly associated with the rate of economic growth. We offer several tentative explanations for these relationships, and discuss whether all forms of polarization are created equal.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajashri Chakrabarti & Matthew Mazewski, 2014. "The Capitol Since the Nineteenth Century: Political Polarization and Income Inequality in the United States," Liberty Street Economics 20140623a, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:86954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2014/06/the-capitol-since-the-nineteenth-century.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Inequality; DW Nominate; dysfunctionality; Polarization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H00 - Public Economics - - General - - - General
    • E2 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:86954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabriella Bucciarelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbnyus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.