IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedhwp/103455.html

Sovereign Risk with Endogenous Debt Limits

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Why do countries set sovereign debt ceilings if they keep raising them? This paper shows that debt ceilings can serve as intermediate commitment devices that reduce expected dilution, thereby lowering spreads—and their volatility—even without reducing total borrowing. We propose a new sovereign default model with long-term debt in which each government inherits a previously announced ceiling but may revise it by paying a political or institutional deviation cost. This friction generates a state-dependent form of partial commitment. The ceiling mitigates debt dilution at the expense of fiscal flexibility, leading the government to voluntarily adopt a ceiling that limits the discretion of its future selves. Governments choose rules that are costly—but not impossible—to adjust, trading off lower spreads and volatility through reduced dilution against the option value of fiscal flexibility in bad times. Consistent with this mechanism, we show that emerging-market countries operating under fiscal rules exhibit lower sovereign spreads and lower spread volatility, even though breaches and revisions occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Arce & Alessandro Villa, 2026. "Sovereign Risk with Endogenous Debt Limits," Working Paper Series WP 2026-08, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedhwp:103455
    DOI: 10.21033/wp-2026-08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.21033/wp-2026-08
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21033/wp-2026-08?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marina Halac & Pierre Yared, 2014. "Fiscal Rules and Discretion Under Persistent Shocks," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82, pages 1557-1614, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bowen, T. Renee & Chen, Ying & Eraslan, Hülya & Zápal, Jan, 2017. "Efficiency of flexible budgetary institutions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 148-176.
    2. Asatryan, Zareh & Castellón, César & Stratmann, Thomas, 2018. "Balanced budget rules and fiscal outcomes: Evidence from historical constitutions," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 105-119.
    3. Marina Halac & Pierre Yared, 2017. "Fiscal Rules and Discretion under Self-Enforcement," NBER Working Papers 23919, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Dino Gerardi & Lucas Maestri & Ignacio Monzon, 2023. "Delegation with Endogenous States," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 711 JEL Classification: C, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    5. Camilo Hernández & Dylan Possamaï, 2024. "Time‐inconsistent contract theory," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 1022-1085, July.
    6. Zhiyuan Jia, 2026. "Random Cap: Optimal Informationally Robust Delegation," Papers 2608.19846, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
    7. Christian Moser & Pierre Yared, 2022. "Pandemic Lockdown: The Role of Government Commitment," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 46, pages 27-50, October.
    8. Emin Ablyatifov & Georgy Lukyanov, 2025. "Government Reputation and Fiscal Capacity," Papers 2509.03087, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
    9. Carranza-Ugarte, Luis & Díaz-Saavedra, Julián & Galdon-Sanchez, Jose Enrique, 2023. "Rethinking fiscal rules," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 833-857.
      • Luis Carranza Ugarte & Julian Diaz Saavedra & Jose Enrique Galdon-Sanchez, 2021. "Rethinking fiscal rules," ThE Papers 21/14, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    10. R. Vijay Krishna & Shiming Fu, 2016. "Dynamic Financial Contracting with Persistent Private Information," 2016 Meeting Papers 89, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    11. Azzimonti, Marina & Battaglini, Marco & Coate, Stephen, 2016. "The costs and benefits of balanced budget rules: Lessons from a political economy model of fiscal policy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 45-61.
    12. Giorgio Bellettini & Paolo Roberti, 2020. "Politicians’ coherence and government debt," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 73-91, January.
    13. Ryota Nakatani, 2021. "Fiscal Rules for Natural Disaster- and Climate Change-Prone Small States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Falilou Fall & Debra Bloch & Jean-Marc Fournier & Peter Hoeller, 2015. "Prudent debt targets and fiscal frameworks," OECD Economic Policy Papers 15, OECD Publishing.
    15. Ferraz, Eduardo & Mantilla, César, 2024. "How risk aversion shapes the trade-off between commitment and flexibility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Facundo Piguillem & Alessandro Riboni, 2021. "Fiscal Rules as Bargaining Chips," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(5), pages 2439-2478.
    17. Ethan Ilzetzki & Heidi Christina Thysen, 2025. "Fiscal Rules and Market Discipline," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 73(1), pages 45-85, March.
    18. Alex Clymo & Andrea Lanteri & Alessandro Villa, 2023. "Capital and Labor Taxes with Costly State Contingency," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 943-964, December.
    19. Pigoń, Adam & Ramsza, Michał, . "Porównanie niemieckiej, szwajcarskiej i polskiej reguły fiskalnej przy użyciu symulacji Monte Carlo," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2022(4).
    20. Facundo Piguillem & Alessandro Riboni, 2015. "Spending-Biased Legislators: Discipline Through Disagreement," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(2), pages 901-949.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E32 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
    • E44 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
    • F41 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Open Economy Macroeconomics
    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedhwp:103455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lauren Wiese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbchus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.