IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedbcw/08-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public-private partnerships, cooperative agreements, and the production of public services in small and rural municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Deller
  • John Halstead
  • Robert D. Mohr

Abstract

Using data from approximately 1,000 small and mostly rural municipalities from Illinois, New Hampshire, and Wisconsin, the authors study choices in production arrangements over a wide range of services, and examine a variety of contracting options available to local governments. The data reveal that municipalities often rely on contracts to provide an extensive list of services. ; The use of for-profit contractors and cooperative agreements with other governments correlates negatively with population. Nonetheless, small municipalities are less likely to use competitive bidding processes, compare costs between production options, and report that privatization produces savings. Other factors, such as median income, rural geography, and ideology, show statistically significant associations with contracting choices. ; Respondents generally consider themselves \"satisfied\" with services provided by contract, although satisfaction levels are lower than those associated with self-provision. Satisfaction with services provided by other governments is lower than satisfaction with services provided by private contractors. This suggests that small municipalities encounter no tradeoff in service quality directly attributable to for-profit contractors.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Deller & John Halstead & Robert D. Mohr, 2008. "Public-private partnerships, cooperative agreements, and the production of public services in small and rural municipalities," New England Public Policy Center Working Paper 08-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedbcw:08-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neppc/wp/2008/neppcwp0804.htm
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neppc/wp/2008/neppcwp0804.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Local government; Rural areas;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedbcw:08-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Spozio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbbous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.