IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fem/femwpa/2003.14.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Theories of Diversity within Organisation Studies: Debates and Future Trajectories

Author

Listed:
  • Maddy Janssens

    (K.U.Leuven, Organisation Studies, Leuven, Belgium)

  • Chris Steyaert

    (University of St Gallen, Chair of Organizational Psychology, St Gallen, Switzerland)

Abstract

Theories on diversity and diversity management within the field of Organisation Studies started to develop in the 80s, mainly under the influence of managerial reports pointing towards the increasing diversity of the future workforce. The purpose of this paper is to 1) review the existing studies on diversity identifying their main purposes, 2) identify the current debates in the field, and 3) point towards possible future directions. the domain has mainly focused on the consequences of diversity and seems to have neglected theoretical reflections on the notions of ‘diversity,’ ‘difference,’ or the ‘other.’ This need for theorising has been indicated by well-known scholars in the field (e.g. Cox, 1995; Nkomo, 1995; 2000; Nkomo & Cox, 1996), concerned about the continuation of the diversity domain. Within these current debates, the authors identified mainly four issues: a narrow or broad definition of diversity, a stable or dynamic conception of identity, the role of power, and the importance of the socio-historical context.

Suggested Citation

  • Maddy Janssens & Chris Steyaert, 2003. "Theories of Diversity within Organisation Studies: Debates and Future Trajectories," Working Papers 2003.14, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  • Handle: RePEc:fem:femwpa:2003.14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.feem.it/userfiles/attach/Publication/NDL2003/NDL2003-014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Identity; diversity; difference; organization studies;

    JEL classification:

    • D20 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fem:femwpa:2003.14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (barbara racah). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/feemmit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.