IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fda/fdaddt/2007-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Diferencias de género y temporalidad: El caso de los profesionales superiores en el sector sanitario en España

Author

Listed:
  • Juan José Dolado
  • Florentino Felgueroso

Abstract

La feminización de las profesiones sanitarias de nivel superior ha venido acompañada de un aumento importante en la precariedad laboral a través de sucesivas bajas laborales y contratos temporales intermitentes. Este fenómeno presenta cierto paralelismo con las relaciones laborales en el sector de la construcción, aun tratándose en este caso de trabajadores menos cualificados. En este trabajo se analizan las diferencias de género en las tasas de incidencia de estas bajas laborales, así como sus efectos sobre los salarios y el tiempo trabajado en el sector sanitario a lo largo de la vida laboral. Se desarrollan diversos métodos empíricos para intentar aislar los posibles efectos composición y cohorte derivados de una tasa de feminización mayor que en otras profesiones, en buena medida debida a una reducción por parte de los varones de la demanda educativa de este tipo de estudios. Finalmente, el estudio también se centra en las diferencias de género entre los sectores público y privado de la sanidad en España.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan José Dolado & Florentino Felgueroso, 2007. "Diferencias de género y temporalidad: El caso de los profesionales superiores en el sector sanitario en España," Working Papers 2007-24, FEDEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:fda:fdaddt:2007-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://documentos.fedea.net/pubs/dt/2007/dt-2007-24web.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Cameron & Alan Collins, 2003. "Estimates of a Model of Male Participation in the Market for Female Heterosexual Prostitution Services," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 271-288, November.
    2. Peter G. Moffatt & Simon A. Peters, 2004. "Pricing Personal Services: An Empirical Study of Earnings in the UK Prostitution Industry," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 51(5), pages 675-690, November.
    3. Marina Della Giusta & Maria Laura Di Tommaso & Isilda Shima & Steinar Strøm, 2009. "What money buys: clients of street sex workers in the US," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(18), pages 2261-2277.
    4. Marina Della Giusta & Maria Laura Di Tommaso & Steinar Strom, 2004. "Another Theory of Prostitution," Economics & Management Discussion Papers em-dp2004-13, Henley Business School, Reading University.
    5. E. Nick Larsen, 1996. "The Effect of Different Police Enforcement Policies on the Control of Prostitution," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 22(1), pages 40-55, March.
    6. Kreps, David M. & Wilson, Robert, 1982. "Reputation and imperfect information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 253-279, August.
    7. Ramseyer, J Mark, 1991. "Indentured Prostitution in Imperial Japan: Credible Commitments in the Commercial Sex Industry," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 89-116, Spring.
    8. Rao, Vijayendra & Gupta, Indrani & Lokshin, Michael & Jana, Smarajit, 2003. "Sex workers and the cost of safe sex: the compensating differential for condom use among Calcutta prostitutes," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 585-603, August.
    9. Lena Edlund & Evelyn Korn, 2002. "A Theory of Prostitution," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(1), pages 181-214, February.
    10. Paul J. Gertler & Manisha Shah, 2011. "Sex Work and Infection: What's Law Enforcement Got to Do with It?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(4), pages 811-840.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fda:fdaddt:2007-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carmen Arias). General contact details of provider: http://www.fedea.net .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.