IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Purchasing Power Parity and Spanish Provinces, 1940-1992

Listed author(s):
  • Irene Olloqui
  • Simón Sosvilla-Rivero

In this paper we empirically assess the validity of the PPP hypothesis from a new point of view. Instead of examining international data, we analyse PPP for Spanish provinces, eliminating many factors frequently offered to explain the failure of PPP. To that end, we make use of annual CPI data covering the 1940-1992 period. We apply time series analysis that allows for the presence of breaks in the trend of that series. We examine all possible bilateral relationships between provincial CPIs, running 2,450 regressions and computing 7,450 statistical tests. Our results are very suggestive since the PPP hypothesis is rejected by the data, even though in our case potential factors explaining the failure of PPP do not apply. Indeed, using robust versions of traditional cointegration techniques, although we find long-run relationships between provincial CPIs in many cases, such relationships do not satisfy in general the restrictions imposed by the PPP. On the other hand, our results indicate long-run relationships for almost all bilateral combinations of provincial CPIs when structural breaks are taken into account, being such breaks statistically significant. In this way, we illustrate how the formal consideration of eventual structural breaks may be useful for a more correct specification of an econometric model. Nevertheless, even with structural breaks the restrictions implied by PPP do not hold.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by FEDEA in its series Working Papers with number 2000-24.

in new window

Date of creation:
Handle: RePEc:fda:fdaddt:2000-24
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fda:fdaddt:2000-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carmen Arias)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.