IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Hodnocení pracoviš výzkumu a vývoje / Evaluation of R&D Institutions [available in Czech only]

The Czech Council for R&D developed a new version of the Methodic for the Evaluation of R&D. In this paper, we discuss especially three criteria from this Methodic: - publications in impacted journals - publications in other scientific refereed journals - evaluation of publications with more authors. The first criterion ignores the birth of a new interdisciplinary database SCOPUS, in the second criterion, a clear definition of a scientific journal is missing. The third criterion we only briefly mention in relation with other problems. We provide the general information about both the SCOPUS and Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory databases, the second one explicitly working with the category „scientific periodical“ and because of that useable for the implementation of the second criterion. We mention another possibility to categorize a scientific journal. We provide information about two methodic for the evaluation of R&D institutions used in the world. In conclusions, we summarize our recommendations.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies in its series Working Papers IES with number 87.

in new window

Length: 7 pages
Date of creation: 2005
Date of revision: 2005
Handle: RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp087
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Opletalova 26, CZ-110 00 Prague

Phone: +420 2 222112330
Fax: +420 2 22112304
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lenka Herrmannova)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.