IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ewp/wpaper/489web.html

Socioeconomic Inequality in Unmet Long-Term Care Needs

Author

Listed:
  • Raquel Andrés

    (Departament d'Economia i CAEPS, Universitat de Barcelona)

  • Alexandrina Stoyanova

    (Departament d'Economia, CAEPS, BEAT, Universitat de Barcelona)

Abstract

Europe’s rapidly ageing population poses critical challenges for long-term care (LTC) systems, particularly guaranteeing equitable access. While socio-economic disparities in LTC utilisation are well documented, inequalities in unmet needs—the gap between required and received care—are less studied. Using the 2019 European Health Interview Survey for Spain, we quantify the care gap in hours and classify unmet needs as full, partial, or none. Employing the concentration index, we assess socio-economic inequalities in unmet needs, stratified by eligibility for publicly funded LTC and by limitation severity (number of ADL limitations). We find a pronounced pro-poor concentration of the care gap, disproportionately affecting women, individuals living alone, and the oldest-old. Among individuals below the eligibility threshold, inequality is not statistically significant; however, it becomes substantial among those who are eligible and increases with the severity of limitations. Our decomposition analysis reveals that health status, income, and living arrangement explain most of the observed inequality. Notably, among eligible individuals with more severe ADL limitations, living arrangement emerges as the largest contributor. These results point to the need to reduce inequalities that disproportionally affect those in the bottom socio-economic strata and address disparities through more effective resource allocation and targeted policy interventions. By providing a granular measure of unmet LTC need and its socio-economic determinants, this study contributes to the broader discussion on fairness and efficiency of LTC provision in ageing societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Raquel Andrés & Alexandrina Stoyanova, 2025. "Socioeconomic Inequality in Unmet Long-Term Care Needs," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2025/489, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ewp:wpaper:489web
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/224745
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ewp:wpaper:489web. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: University of Barcelona School of Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feubaes.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.