IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rpdpjp/26013.html

Introduction to EBPM (Evidence-Based Policy Making) Episode 6: The Data Needed for Evidence-Based Policymaking Already Exist Within the Government (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • Yoichi SEKIZAWA

Abstract

Administrative data held by government agencies are valuable because they are comprehensive and enable the longitudinal tracking of the same individuals over time—features that official statistics or survey data typically do not possess. Therefore, promoting their use for evidence-based policymaking (EBPM) and research purposes is important. In some countries, such as the Nordic nations, the use of administrative data is already well established, and countries like the United States and the United Kingdom are also exploring ways to further expand their use. Expanding the use of administrative data involves challenges, including protecting privacy and managing the increased administrative burden on government agencies. Addressing these competing demands is essential, and one key framework for doing so is the concept of the “Five Safes.” In Japan, local governments have greater potential than the central government to expand the use of administrative data, and it would be highly beneficial for local governments to lead pioneering initiatives using such data, including implementing randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Suggested Citation

  • Yoichi SEKIZAWA, 2026. "Introduction to EBPM (Evidence-Based Policy Making) Episode 6: The Data Needed for Evidence-Based Policymaking Already Exist Within the Government (Japanese)," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 26013, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:26013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/26p013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:26013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.