IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rpdpjp/23020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

[WTO and International Trade Case Review Series No. 42] Korea – Labor Commitments : Impact of labor clauses in the free trade agreement (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • SEKINE Takemasa

Abstract

The place for discussion regarding the relationship between trade and labor is gradually shifting from the World Trade Organization (WTO) to free trade agreements (FTAs). Different from the previous theoretical discussions under the WTO, recent discussions in FTAs entail concrete disputes. Among those disputes, Korea – Labor Commitments is a landmark case. The Panel of Experts found that some provisions in the Korea’s trade union law infringed the provision (Article 13.4 EU-Korea FTA) that requires parties to respect the principles of the International Labour Organization (ILO). On the other hand, the Panel rejected the complaint that Korea is not showing sufficient effort to ratify the core ILO Conventions. The case was prominent in that the issues discussed in the dispute had tenuous relationship with trade. The success in bringing the case into FTA dispute settlement mechanism may enhance the possibility that similar “domestic†labor issues will be addressed in FTA mechanisms. In addition, the case was also notable in the sense of excellent implementation of panel’s recommendation. Nevertheless, the EU is reinforcing the implementation power of labor clauses in new FTAs. Korea – Labor Commitments is an essential case in considering the development of labor clauses in trade agreements.

Suggested Citation

  • SEKINE Takemasa, 2023. "[WTO and International Trade Case Review Series No. 42] Korea – Labor Commitments : Impact of labor clauses in the free trade agreement (Japanese)," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 23020, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:23020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/23p020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:23020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.